Bryant Kroll, Attorney at Law

Office: (615) 994-1837

  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • In the Media
  • Downloads
  • More
    • Home
    • FAQ
    • Articles
    • In the Media
    • Downloads

Office: (615) 994-1837

Bryant Kroll, Attorney at Law
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • In the Media
  • Downloads

Dorris et al. v. Kim Kelley et al: First Amended Complaint

Dorris et. al. v. Kim Kelley et al: Original Complaint

DONATE TO LEGAL FUND FOR MILLERSVILLE DETECTIVES - https://w

Downloads - Nashville RICO Law Suit- Millersville Detectives

Summary of Complaint:  This RICO law suit was filed on behalf of Millersville detectives, Capt. Todd Dorris and Det. Michael Candler, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville against Defendants Kim Kelley and Phillip Joseph Drake, Uniting America Inc., Digital Defenders United, and Grow Online LLC, alleging that Defendants Drake and Kelley are involved in various illegal activities, including money laundering, kidnapping, and fraud, under the guise of operating nonprofit organizations to rescue children who are being trafficked.   The Complaint includes federal claims of misappropriation, as well as violations of the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), alleging that the Defendants' actions are part of their concerted efforts to promote their own fraudulent racketeering enterprises by means of engaging in a coordinated smear campaign to undermine Plaintiffs' credibility and attack their character with false allegations.The Complaint alleges that the Defendants published false and defamatory statements about the Plaintiffs' involvement in a pedophile sting operation, causing significant reputational harm. The Complaint alleges that the Defendants tortiously interfered with the Plaintiffs' employment and unlawfully disclosed the identity of Det. Candler, who was employed as an undercover narcotics  officer at the Millersville Police Department.  



Complaint - Capt. Todd Dorris et al. v. Kim Kelley, Phil Drake, Uniting America Inc., Digital Defen (pdf)

Download

First Amended Complaint - Capt. Todd Dorris et al. v. Kim Kelley, Phil Drake, Phil Williams et al. (pdf)

Download

Download - Whistleblower Shawn TayLor & Bryan

  • This federal lawsuit, filed on behalf of former Assistant Chief Shawn Taylor and Chief Bryan Morris of the Millersville Police Department, exposes an orchestrated campaign of defamation, retaliation, and racketeering carried out by investigative reporter Phil Williams, NewsChannel 5, politically motivated city officials, and their associates.
  • The Complaint alleges that, beginning in early 2024, the defendants coordinated a smear campaign to destroy the reputations and careers of Taylor and Morris. Using fabricated quotes, false attributions, and deliberately stripped context, Williams and NewsChannel 5 published a series of sensationalized articles—branding Taylor as “Millersville’s conspiracy cop”—while knowingly misrepresenting his past service, professional qualifications, and public statements.
  • In one of the most striking allegations in the lawsuit, Phil Williams is accused of turning a trusted source into his next headline. According to the Complaint, in January 2023 Shawn Taylor — then a sworn law enforcement officer — voluntarily provided documents to Williams and NewsChannel 5 reporter Levi Ismail as a confidential source. Text messages between Taylor and Ismail confirm that Williams knew exactly who Taylor was, what he had uncovered, and why it mattered.  Yet, more than a year later, Williams allegedly repackaged that cooperation into a false narrative, pretending to “discover” Taylor during his high-profile coverage of Gabrielle Hanson. The lawsuit calls it a from-source-to-scapegoat maneuver — a calculated rewrite of history that transformed a whistleblower into a target.  The Complaint frames this as a fundamental breach of journalistic ethics, weaponizing confidential cooperation for a hit piece. According to the plaintiffs, it’s a textbook example of how tortious interference, defamation, and coordinated media manipulation can be deployed to destroy reputations under the guise of investigative reporting.
  • The suit details how Williams falsely claimed Taylor had “no evidence” for his statements about political corruption, misrepresented years-old podcasts, and republished unprivileged false statements made during public meetings by Commissioners Cristina Templet and David Gregory. These included demonstrably false claims about Taylor’s employment history, mental fitness, and law enforcement record—claims refuted by the City’s own records and by Chief Morris on the record.
  • The Complaint further alleges that these media attacks were not legitimate journalism, but rather coordinated acts of First Amendment retaliation designed to silence whistleblowing on government corruption, influence the outcome of local elections, and undermine honest governance in Millersville.
  • This lawsuit exposes one of the most egregious real-life fake news campaigns in Tennessee history. It alleges that NewsChannel 5 reporter Phil Williams used a calculated mix of unethical journalism tactics and political propaganda techniques to smear Assistant Chief Shawn Taylor and Chief Bryan Morris. These include time-warping the timeline of events to fabricate cause-and-effect, source obfuscation to hide the fact that Taylor was originally a confidential source, mischaracterization of statements to make him appear to hold views he never expressed, guilt by association with extremist groups he never joined, and selective omission of facts that would have cleared him. The lawsuit details Williams’ repeated character assassination, manufactured outrage, and target-to-enemy flips—turning a trusted source into the supposed villain—along with other hallmarks of coordinated smear operations, from label laundering (“conspiracy cop”) to narrative seeding designed to infect public opinion. Anyone researching propaganda tactics in journalism, media smear campaigns, or how fake news works in practice will find this case a definitive example.
  • Counts in the lawsuit include Defamation, Civil RICO, and First Amendment Retaliation, among others, seeking damages for the severe reputational and economic harm inflicted on both plaintiffs.

Complaint - Shawn Taylor, Bryan Morris v. Kim Kelley, Phil Williams, et al. (pdf)

Download

OFFICE: (615) 994-1837



Copyright © 2024 Bryant Kroll, Attorney at Law - All Rights Reserved.

  • Downloads

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept